Back to Messageboard | Home | Site Map  

Squashed philosophers  
Posted by Jean Tollett on October 22 2007, 10:21 » Uploaded 22/10/07 12:27  

Here's a good idea. The world's greatest philosophers squashed into bite-size texts, a little like those beginners guides that you see in bookshops.

THE VERY SQUASHED VERSION (of Sartre's existentialism)
Existentialism is being identified with ugliness; criticised by Christians for being despairing and non-serious, by Communists for being too subjective and by both for lack of hope. They think that man needs firm rules.
What, then, is "existentialism"? Existentialists, be they Christians or atheists (like myself) believe that existence comes before essence- that we must begin with the subjective. A manufactured object, say a paper knife, is made to serve a purpose. For us, our existence comes first, we have each our own Project; to choose our own purpose, and in doing so to choose an image for all to follow. Existentialists state frankly that man is in anguish unable but to choose. Like Abraham, who obeyed the angel, but had to first choose if it was really an angel, and if he was really Abraham. We are abandoned by God, left alone without excuse, to interpret alone such signs as there are. Even when we seek advice, it is we who choose who to ask. We must despair of help from outside our will, or beyond the possibilities of action. Descartes said "Conquer yourself" and meant the same- that we should act without hope.
To the Communists who look to help from comrades and those 'quietists' who let others do the things they can't, I say that reality is action. We must judge the artist by his works, the man by his actions; not by mere hopes, dreams and unfulfilled expectations. We are not pessimists, but sturdy optimists.
We begin with Descartes I think, therefore I am- the basic truth for everyone. But we discover in it all others as well as ourselves.
We are not anarchists, nor are we immoral. We judge a man by his commitments and accuse those who deny their freedom of bad faith. We cannot have liberty unless there is liberty for all. We have to take things as they are.

COMMENTS Post comment


Comment 01 – Brian D October 22 2007, 14:34

Thanks for that, Jean. I always liked the "existence comes before essence" line. Large numbers of people on the political right (and left) still see things differently, of course - they "see" the true essences behind the appearances. In other words, they're living in the backward metaphysical universe of Plato and Aristotle.

The scientific viewpoint (like existentialism) opposes this - we have only appearances to observe and measure.

And the cognitive scientists map our "inner" worlds based on appearances, observations, measurements.

Only the priests, popes and the emotionally hysterical know the real truth, the true essence of things. And they're welcome to it, as long as they leave me alone.

Comment 02 – Ken Farrell October 22 2007, 18:11

Brian wrote: "And they're welcome to it, as long as they leave me alone".

As you all, probably, are already aware, those who know the Ultimate Truth tend to be the ones least likely to leave other people alone. They're like the Jehovah's Witnesses of politics. They have the delusion that forever knocking on people's doors (or on their email inboxes) is the way to salvation for humanity. I'm sure you know the types I'm talking about.



Post comment

Display email
  Don't display    Display
Lifespan of comment   Delete after 3 weeks    Keep permanent if post is permanent  


Optional link URL:
eg ""
Optional link text:
eg "Media Hell"


  Messageboard Back to top